Friday, 25 February 2011

Making roads better in Oval

Today Jack and I met up with our assembly member Val Shawcross and fellow Labour Councillors Mark and Stephen from Princes Ward to discuss with officers residents concerns of the roads near Oval tube and Kennington Park.

Issues included:
  • Potholes
  • Cycle safety (I was clearly testing this issue personally)
  • Pedestrian crossings
  • The bus lane

Wednesday, 23 February 2011

The speach I would have made...

Tonight protesters stopped democracy. By preventing the full council in public we couldn't discuss important issues around Lambeth's budget. Members of the public couldn't hear us debate. This is a massive shame.

I was also due to make my maiden speech. Not wanting to waste my hard work I thought I'd post it!

I am so pleased that only £1 million of the £37 million of cuts this year has resulted in straight cuts to services. Despite scare mongering on management costs, where possible, cuts have been made to costs before services. This is because we know how important our front line services are to residents – and to a small group of our most vulnerable residents these services are a true lifeline.

For these residents front line services are make or break, for them and their families. They often don’t participate in resident engagement. But our residents who did respond to our consultation on the budget, told us they want to protect social services for children, disabled people, older people and those most disadvantaged. This is their priority and this is our priority, and we have protected core services to these groups.

The voices arguing for our playgrounds, parks and libraries are articulate, passionate and informed and most importantly understand the decision making process. We are fortunate to have so many dedicated groups like these in Oval. Many of these groups understand the opportunity the co-operative council affords us to not withdraw services, but to deliver them differently.

However, you rarely find the users of some our most important services campaigning outside the Town Hall. They probably won’t be writing to the South London Press and they probably wont lobby their local Councillors or MPs. But our job as Councillors is to listen not just to the informed few – but to represent our whole community.

We haven’t got time to moon over the what might have been. In the short space of time officers and councillors have had to respond to these cuts, they have had to be creative, collaborative and bold. To think about services in different ways. And we have achieved this because we know what it would mean to many of our residents if they lost vital core services.

We have ensured the continued provision of essential services for our most vulnerable children and adults. Children with special educational needs and disabilities have been protected. There will be a new Livity special needs school. We are not closing any childrens centres.

Unlike Councils like Devon County Council we have protected services to the victims of Domestic violence.

When we lost 100% of the funding for our team which supports residents with HIV – we said it was too important to loose and made the decision to find the money from elsewhere.

Despite the government cutting the grant for free swimming we have managed to part fund a programme that allows under 16’s and over 60’s to swim for just £1.

We are investing £106m in Housing despite the government not being able to commit to the ALMO funding.

We are delivering a £100 million investment programme into our schools despite the government cancelling the building schools for the future project.

We have protected the eligibility criteria for adult care services so the council will continue to provide care for residents in both substantial and critical need.

Targeted youth services are protected and the government watchdog Ofsted rated Lambeth Council among the best in the country in its work to help disaffected teenagers into education, training or work.

I didn't become a Labour Cllr to make cuts to valued services, but I did become a Cllr to make sure that when there are tough decisions to be made- we make the right decisions which prioritise the most vulnerable in our community.

- Posted by jane

Monday, 14 February 2011

S106 on the Vauxhall Nine Elms and Battersea Opportunity Area

Below is correspondance for consultation by the GLA about S106 (planning obligation) payments and the Vauxhall Nine Elms Battersea opportunity area planning framework. Comments to be received by the Mayor by 25 March.

We are concerned about the below on page 8:

"It is proposed that developer tariff/CIL contributions should be pooled and that the VNEB Strategy Board should have input into the prioritisation of projects and the allocation of funds as the development and specific infrastructure requirements are taken forward. Until an OA CIL is adopted, it is proposed that Section 106 tariff contributions should be linked to “the provision of infrastructure to support the development of the OA” and not to specific projects or areas."

It is important that Lambeth residents benefit from these developments and are not adversly impacted. We need strong representation to ensure Vauxhall is at the heart of decision making and Lambeth residents don't see all the CIL go to the northern line extention.

If you have concerns, please respond to the consultation and please let us know. We will be putting a repsonse in and we are keen to hear your priorities. We are keen that the needs of Vauxhall now, and in the future, are properly considered. The infrastructure study, in our view, needs reviewing because it doesn't fully reflect the needs of this area and the impact our communities will feel through this development.

Details below:

Dear Stakeholder,
You are receiving this e-mail because you previously made representations on the consultation draft Vauxhall-Nine Elms-Battersea opportunity area planning framework (November 2009).

The GLA is currently consulting on a revised Section 106 chapter of the opportunity area planning framework. The chapter sets out two tariffs which developers will be required to pay for both residential and commercial buildings, based on the location of the development within the Opportunity Area.

The revised chapter is based on a development infrastructure funding study which was prepared by Roger Tym & Partners, Peter Brett Associates and GVA Grimley on behalf of the GLA, the London Boroughs of Wandsworth and Lambeth and landowners.

The revised S106 chapter and infrastructure funding study are published here http://www.london.gov.uk/who-runs-london/mayor/publications/planning/vauxhall-nine-elms-battersea-s-106

You can send your views by email or by post:
by email to: mayor@london.gov.uk with 'VNEB S106' in the title. If you send in a response by email it is not necessary to also send us a hard copy.
by post (no stamp required) to: Boris Johnson, Mayor of London (VNEB S106) FREEPOST LON15799 GLA City Hall, post point 18 The Queen's Walk London SE1 2BR
All responses (emails and letters) must be received by 5:00 pm on 25 March 2011.

Yours sincerely,
Planning Decisions Unit Greater London Authority

Vauxhall Square consultation

On Friday Jack and I got up bright and early and went to a consultation meeting, with planning officers and members of the public, on the Vauxhall Square development proposals.

The plans include a linear walk linking the site with the proposed linear park (in the overall plans for the Vauxhall, Nine Elms and Battersea Opportunity Area), a public square, residential flats and shops.

More information can be found at http://www.vauxhallsquare.co.uk/home2.php and we welcome your feedback on the proposals to ovallabour@gmail.com

Kennington Park Estate Resident Engagement

On Saturday 12th February Jack met with residents and staff at Kennington Park Estate to help develop community programme at the Community Centre.

Over 20 residents turned out to shape this plan and to ensure that the right services are offered including women's networks and events, things for young people to do and how to create local partnerships with neighbouring amenities.

This programme is the start of a process which Hyde Southbank Homes have initiated as they recognise that resident led programme building is the key to success.

Jack and Jane will continue to support the efforts to involve residents in decision making and taking control of their services.

Octave Tower - Win for Resident Power!

Last week the Secretary of State upheld the Inspector's decision to dismiss the appeal from the Bondway developers for the Octave Tower. The inspector's decision was based on the grounds of being overbearing, impact on local parks, lack of open space and children's play space after Lambeth's planning committee rejected the proposals under pressure from a vocal and campaigning public.

The Octave Tower, proposed for the Bondway self storage site next to Vauxhall gyratory, was deemed too dense and lacked amenity and public open space, especially for children living in the family sized properties.

The Inspector did not feel that Vauxhall Park would not be significantly harmed by overshadowing or overlooking but it was the intensity of extra residents impacting on the park which was unacceptable.

This absolutely fits with what Cllrs Jack Hopkins and Jane Edbrooke feel with respect to all the developments in Vauxhall, "Improvements to Green and Open space, is not the same as increasing more Green and Open space,"

We both congratulate local residents and specifically Viva Vauxhall and Friends of Vauxhall Park, who mounted an impressive challenge to the Octave Tower.

The 170 page inspector's decision is available for free here:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planning-callins/pdf/1839699.pdf

Tuesday, 8 February 2011

Lambeth Labour make tough decisions in the face of 27% cuts

Again Steve sets out clearly the tough decisions from last nights cabinet meeting:

http://cllrstevereed.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/labour-sets-budget/

And fellow Cllr Mark Bennett also has a good take on the meeting:

http://markbennettlabour.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/knight-of-the-living-dead/

Lambeth's cabinet - with backing from Labour Group, faced possibly the most difficult budget in 50 years. These cuts were forced on the Council by the Tory-led government and are not of our making or choosing. However, we have worked hard to apply Labours values to the decisions taken, protecting the most vulnerable in our communities.